The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF
sample above, taken from our
Tort Law: Nominate Torts Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have
odd formatting.
LIABILITY FOR ANIMALS
• Neat
• Strict liability for damage caused by animals which falls into 3 categories:
a) General common law principle - negligence, nuiance, tresspass b) Special common law c) Statutory liability
• Trespass, nuisance, scienter, negligence > they are all actions depending on the case.
GENERAL COMMON LAW
A) NEGLIGENCE
Howard v Bergin & O'Connor
D failed to use platform provided to load a bullock. Failed to lock gate to public road. Failed to attend to cattle. Result = P's injury arising from D's negligence
B) PUBLIC NUISANCE
Cunningham v Whelan
P's horse and cart damaged by D's bullocks on highway. 24 bullocks involved amounted to obstruction = nuisance and recovery allowed.
- Amount unreasonable
C) PRIVATE NUISANCE
O'Gorman v O'Gorman
D's bees swarmed on plaintiff's land. P thrown from his horse.
- Maintenance and number of bees render the circumstance unreasonable
D) CATTLE TRESSPASS
• If you drive cattle into another person's land, this is trespass to land and general principles apply. • Cattle that stray fall under a cattle trespass rule
Cattle trespass rule
• Confined to cattle but broad interpretation
• Strict liability if they stray on own will
• Defences differ
E) OCCUPIER'S LIABILITY
- The Occupier's liability act reformed common law rules relating to injuries on an occupier's land
- Q as to whether the act replaced common law for injuries caused by animals on occupier's land, or do separate rules apply?
McMahon v Binchy says:
* Separate liability for animals
F) RYLAND'S V FLETCHER
• If you can establish that the keeping on the animals was unnatural use of the land, may be actionable under this rule
SPECIAL COMMON LAW
A) Cattle trespass
• Identifiable breeds of cattle from case law:
Horses, sheep, goats, pigs, asses, domesticated deer, fowl
• Not dogs, cats and domestic
• Cattle trespass applies to cattle that stray from:
- One field adjoining another
- One field adjoining the highway to another field
Kennedy v McCabe
- Doesn't apply to cattle driven onto the road - you must prove negligence
PROPER DEFENDANT
• Cattle owner or land owner from which cattle have strayed? Dalton v Sullivan
Landowner leased grazing land to cattle owner and agreed to herd the cattle for him. The owner of the cattle lived 100 miles away
- Ownership not sufficient alone
Winter v Owens
- D owner, personally fed and tended to the animals liable
DAMAGE to:
Cronin v Connor
- Land and crops
McCabe v Delaney
- Injury to animals
Wormald v Cole
- Personal injury
DEFENCESAct of god
Plaintiff's fault
Contributory negligence 3rd party fault
ANIMALS AND THE HIGHWAY
• Rural setting
Searle v Wallbank
- Immunity for animals on highway
• Abolished by Animals Act 1985
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.
We offer free case summaries, sample notes, and award-winning content, all curated and approved by our editorial team. Our reputation for excellence has led to features in The Guardian, Wikipedia, and the National Council for Law Reporting (Kenya Law).
Every year, millions of students utilize our free and premium notes to aid their studies.