The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF
sample above, taken from our
Criminal Liability Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have
odd formatting.
CONSPIRACY
Rationale:
•
•
•
•
What a group of people can achieve as opposed to an individual person in relation to the same crime.
But what about the difficulty also?
Escape mainly and inconvenience
The difference between conspiracy and the other two, Is that•
•
Conspiracy can be attached to mere civil wrongs as well as crimes
Conspiracy is a crime in itself, meaning it renders a civil wrong, a criminal wrong.
2 main features:
1. Agreement - mens rea, actus reus considered
2. The unlawful activity that the conspiracy relates to, the objects or goals of the conspiracy.
STATUTE:
Part 7 of the criminal justice act 2006
➢
•
•
•
Conspiracy to commit a serious offence (carries four years or more)
Just placing some common law on statutory footing.
No definition of conspire
Leaving it to judicial discretion
Criminal Justice Amendment act
➢ Criminalises 'criminal organisations' assisting, directing, and participating in a conspiracy attaching to specific offences.
•
There is a distinction between criminal organisation conspirers and conspiracies in the sense of a group of people forming a conspiratorial agreement
R v MeyrickDifficult
ACTUS REUS
Mulcahy v The Queen 1868'Agreement of two or more to do an unlawful act, or to do a lawful act by unlawful means'
LRC;
•
Definition of conspiracy should be codified
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.
We offer free case summaries, sample notes, and award-winning content, all curated and approved by our editorial team. Our reputation for excellence has led to features in The Guardian, Wikipedia, and the National Council for Law Reporting (Kenya Law).
Every year, millions of students utilize our free and premium notes to aid their studies.