Irish BCL Notes > Trinity College Dublin Irish BCL Notes > Irish Land Law Notes

Licences Notes

This is a sample of our (approximately) 3 page long Licences notes, which we sell as part of the Irish Land Law Notes collection, a 2.2 package written at Trinity College Dublin in 2008 that contains (approximately) 51 page of notes across 12 different document.

Learn more about our Irish Land Law Notes

The original file is a 'Word (Docx)' whilst this sample is a 'PDF' representation of said file. This means that the formatting here may have errors. The original document you'll receive on purchase should have more polished formatting.

Licences Revision

The following is a plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Irish Land Law Notes. This text version has had its formatting removed so pay attention to its contents alone rather than its presentation. The version you download will have its original formatting intact and so will be much prettier to look at.

Licences

*

A licence is a permission which entitles one person to enter the land of another. Bare Licence

*

*

*

Thomas v Sorrell - the grant of a licence does not transfer any interest or estate in the land to the licencee. Wood v Leadbitter - a parol licence is revocable at any time Greater London Council v Jenkins (CA) - held to be a contractual as opposed to a bare licence due to a condition requiring the property be inspected by the defendants during their occupation. Licence Coupled with an Interest

*

*

*

*

This licence arises when somebody is given an interest in land (e.g. right to cut trees) and is required in order to allow the person to exploit his interest (James Jones & Sons v Earl of Tankerville) Gilmore v The O'Conor Don (SC) - a life tenant could only grant a licence couple with an interest in cutting down and removing trees for his life and the licence expires after his death. Frogley v Lovelace (Ch) - a specifically enforceable contract setting up a licence coupled with in an interest will allow the plaintiff to obtain an injunction. Hurst v Picture Theatres (CA) - a plaintiff who was removed from a cinema on foot of the mistake belief that he had not paid successfully sued for assault - he was not a trespasser and his licence could not be revoked if supported by consideration Contractual Licence

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

Whipp v Mackey (SC) - a licensor can be prevented revoking a licence where this would be a breach of contract Winter Garden Theatre v Millenium Productions (HoL) - agreed with the principle that a licence cannot be considered separately from the contract which created it - their terms are the same Hounslow LBC v Twickenham Garden Developments (Ch) - it was held to be a term of a contract for the construction of buildings not to revoke any licences except in accordance with the contract Tanner v Tanner (CA)

* the defendant lived with the plaintiff who was the father of her daughters

* after he went to live with another woman he purported to revoke her licence

* the court (Lord Denning) held that a contractual licence could be implied from the circumstances, though there are problems with the certainty of contractual terms McGill v S (HC)

* the parties had been cohabiting and during this time constructed a house in Ireland

* The court decline to follow Tanner as it was not founded on any clear principle nor was it possible to ascertain when or how the licence came into being Chandler v Kerley (CA) - Tanner followed, but less expansively - an actual contract existed (defendants sold house to plaintiff cheaply in exchange for licence to live there) and the licence was to be determinable on reasonable notice. Hardwick v Johnson (CA)

****************************End Of Sample*****************************

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Irish Land Law Notes.