Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Defences DuressCoercion Notes

Irish BCL Notes > Irish Criminal Law Notes

This is an extract of our Defences DuressCoercion document, which we sell as part of our Irish Criminal Law Notes collection written by the top tier of Trinity College Dublin students.

The following is a more accessble plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Irish Criminal Law Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

Duress/Coercion The State v Walsh (SC 1981) Facts

* The plaintiffs, a married couple, had been called before the courts on charges of contempt, as a result of statements made by them about the Special Criminal Court.

* There was a common law presumption that the act of a wife committed in the presence of her husband was a result of his coercion. Issue

* Duress - Common Law Presumption Judgment

* Even a rebuttable presumption based on the idea that a wife but not a husband can be coerced is repugnant to Article 40.1. People v Whelan (CCA 1933) Facts

* The accused was charged with receiving stolen goods and in his defence, claimed that he had acted under the influence of violent threats. Issue

* Duress Judgment (Murnaghan J)

* Threats of immediate death or violence that are so great to overbear ordinary human resistance should be accepted as justification for acts which would otherwise be criminal.

* This principle should be subject to some limitations - e.g. murder can not be justified. DPP for Northern Ireland v Lynch (HoL 1975) Facts

* The accused had aided a group of IRA men when they went to kill a police officer.

* He claimed that he had only participated as he had been subject to threats. Issue

* Duress - Application to secondary offenders Judgment

* Lord Morris of Borth-y-Gest (concurring)

* A man who aids and abets a murder under duress is in a different situation to someone who actually kills someone under duress - death is a certainty in the latter, but not in former.

* Thus the an aider or abettor of a murder should be allowed to rely on the defence of duress.

* Lord Wilberforce (concurring)

* In the history of law, the defence of duress seems to have evolved separately from the issues of acts or will - thus it should not be analysed in the context of intention.

* On a matter of common sense, the duress required to justify a crime must

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Irish Criminal Law Notes.