This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Equity Detailed Notes - The Nature of Equity

Notice: PDF Preview
The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our The Nature of Equity Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting.
See Original

LECTURE 1 The Nature of Equity 1

The Nature of Equity 1

Historical Background 1

The Development of Modern Equity 2

Fusion of Law and Equity? 2

Maxims of Equity 3

Equity will not suffer a wrong to be without a remedy 3

Equity follows the Law 4

He who seeks equity must do equity 4

He who comes to equity must come with clean hands 5

Delay defeats equity 6

Effect of the Statute of Limitations 1957 7

Laches and acquiescence 7

Equality is equity 8

Equity looks to the intent rather than the form 8

Equity looks on that as done which ought to have been done 9

Equity imputes an intention to fulfil an obligation 9

Equity acts in personam 9

LECTURE 2 Injunctions 13

Perpetual Injunctions 13

Other Discretionary Factors 14

Delay/Acquiescence 14

Effect on Third Parties 15

Interlocutory Injunctions 16

The Campus Oil Principles 16

Mandatory Injunctions 23

Mandatory Injunctions at the Trial of the Action 23

Interlocutory Mandatory Injunctions 23

Quia Timet Injunctions 25

Mareva Injunctions 26

Origins of the Mareva Injunction 26

Prerequisites to a Mareva Injunction 27

Extra-Territorial Mareva Injunctions 30

Summary of Mareva Injunctions 33

Anton Piller Order 34

The Nature of Anton Piller Orders 34

Options for a defendant facing an Anton Piller Order 35

Bayer Injunctions 37

LECTURE 3 Specific Performance 41

Specific Performance in Particular Situations 41

Contracts for the Sale of Land 41

Contracts requiring supervision 43

Contracts to build and repair 45

Contracts for personal services 46

Defences to Specific Performance 47

Lack of Mutuality 47

Mistake 47

Misrepresentation 48

Laches or Delay 48

Hardship 49

Illegality and Public Policy 49

Impossibility and Frustration 50

LECTURE 4 Equitable Remedies: Rectification 53

Grounds for rectification 53

Mutual mistake 53

Unilateral mistake 56

Onus of proof 58

Discretionary factors 59

Instruments which may be rectified 59

LECTURE 5 Equitable Remedies: Rescission 61

Grounds for equitable rescission 61

Misrepresentation/fraudulent misrepresentation 61

Innocent misrepresentation 62

Mistake 63

Undue influence 64

Undue influence and third parties 73

Unconscionable/improvident transactions 79

LECTURE 6 Equitable Doctrines, Equitable Interests and Equities 87

Equitable doctrines 87

Equitable interests 103

LECTURE 7 Equitable Doctrines – Estoppel 111

Promissory estoppel 111

Propretary estoppels 114

Relationship between proprietary and promissory estoppels 123

LECTURE 8 Introduction to Trusts 125

Definition of a trust 125

Distinguishing trusts from other concepts 125

Classification of trusts 126

LECTURE 9 Creating Express Trust 129

Formalities 129

The Three Certainties 130

LECTURE 10 Constitution of Trusts 137

Exceptions to the rule that equity will not assist a volunteer 139

LECTURE 11 Secret Trusts 145

Classification of secret trusts 145

Fully secret trusts 145

Half-secret trusts 147

LECTURE 12 Purpose Trusts 153

The need for clarity and certainty 153

The need for compliance with the rules against perpetuities and inalienability 154

Exceptions to the general principle 155

LECTURE 13 Charitable Trusts 159

Legislative framework 159

Trusts for the relief of poverty 162

Trusts for the advancement of education 164

Trusts for the advancement of religion 166

Trusts for other purposes beneficial to the community 167

LECTURE 14 Cy-Près Doctrine 171

Initial failure of charitable trust 171

Subsequent failure of charitable trust 172

Charities Act 1961 172

Application of the cy-près jurisdiction 174

LECTURE 15 Resulting Trusts 177

The nature of resulting trusts 177

Automatic resulting trusts 177

Quistclose trust 179

Transfer of personality 182

Joint Accounts 182

LECTURE 16 Property Rights of Cohabitees 191

Constructive trusts 195

Proprietary estoppel 196

LECTURE 17 Constructive Trusts 199

Institutional constructive trust 199

Unauthorised profits by fiduciaries 201

Liability of a stranger to a trust as a constructive trustee 202

Further aspects of constructive trusts 208

LECTURE 18 Trustees 213

Appointment, removal and retirement of trustees 213

Powers and duties of trustees 215

Reform 221

LECTURE 19 Tracing 225

Tracing at common law 225

Tracing in Equity 225

Restrictions on equitable tracing 229

Welcome to Equity and Trusts! Usually Lecture 1 contains general and somewhat unimportant information; this is most definitely not the case for this course. The topic of equitable maxims which is dealt with in detail in this chapter is highly examinable. What is even better is that it is quite simple, and the same question is almost always asked. In all past exam papers the same question has been asked, with the exception of April 2007. Therefore, this is an area that requires detailed consideration so as to maximize your marks in the exam.

One of the hardest questions for any lawyer to answer is “what is equity”? In order to understand the answer to that question it is necessary to examine the historical background to the development of equity as a body of law. Equity emerged from the rules and principles that were developed by the Court of Chancery during the sixteenth, seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Modern equity plays an important role in our legal system however in order to understand the modern case law it is first necessary to consider the origins of equity

THE NATURE OF EQUITY

Historical Background

By the end of the 13th century in England the common law had developed into quite a rigid set of rules. There were a number of problems in the way in which the common law was being administered. Keane identifies three significant defects of the common law at the time.1 Firstly, a person might not have been able to obtain justice if his opponent was too powerful or because the courts did not function effectively in his local area. A second problem facing litigants was the rigidity of the common law. If a litigant was not able to frame his complaint within the constraints of an existing procedure he could not proceed...

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more.
The Nature of Equity

More The Nature Of Equity Samples

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

©2024 Oxbridge Notes. All right reserved.